gopher Fri Feb 2 01:03:44 2001
Time
Michael, did you know that clock being used for your forum is at least 10 minutes fast? I just read a 12:58 post at 12:48.
For reference, the time according to time.nist.gov at the time of posting is 00:50:40
|
gopher Fri Feb 2 01:04:38 2001
Re: Time
> For reference, the time according to time.nist.gov at the time of posting
> is 00:50:40
Wow, 13 minutes. How'd it get so far ahead?
|
Michael Fri Feb 2 01:06:36 2001
Re: Time
> Wow, 13 minutes. How'd it get so far ahead?
It's been gaining for a long time. About four years.
|
Michael Fri Feb 2 01:05:41 2001
Re: Time
> Michael, did you know that clock being used for your forum is at least 10
> minutes fast? I just read a 12:58 post at 12:48.
> For reference, the time according to time.nist.gov at the time of posting
> is 00:50:40
Yes, the box is running about ten minutes fast.
...
How *do* you set the time on Solaris? I've just never taken the time to find out.
|
gopher Fri Feb 2 01:08:14 2001
Re: Time
> How *do* you set the time on Solaris? I've just never taken the time to
> find out.
Well, I don't have root on a solaris box handy, but it looks from the help output to be the same as in Linux ('date mmddHHMM'), with the capital letters being hour and minute.
|
gopher Fri Feb 2 01:09:16 2001
Re: Time
> How *do* you set the time on Solaris? I've just never taken the time to
> find out.
Another option would be rdate, i.e 'rdate time.nist.gov'
|
Michael Fri Feb 2 23:22:41 2001
Re: Time
> Another option would be rdate, i.e 'rdate time.nist.gov'
Ooh. Works like magic. Thanks, gopher.
|
|