Lord Emsworth Tue Nov 14 00:45:00 2000
11/13 spoiler (return of an old friend)
Quick post as it's getting late, but very pleasantly surprised by the triumphant re-appearance of the great Toonbot dot! I expect High Priest Gopher will be quite pleased, as well. Also rather liked the slightly Seussian rhythm in the captions (reminiscent of "Fox in Socks.") Capital job, Mr. Roberts. And goodnight.
|
Michael Tue Nov 14 01:03:10 2000
Re: 11/13 spoiler (return of an old friend)
> Capital job, Mr. Roberts. And goodnight.
*zzzzzzzzzzzzz*snort! What?!? What? Oh. Yes. Thanks. G'night.........zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz)(*@&#$(*@&#($*&@#$ NO CARRIER
|
gopher Tue Nov 14 01:05:59 2000
Re: 11/13 spoiler (return of an old friend)
> I expect High Priest Gopher will be quite pleased, as well.
Indeed! I'm just happy to know that my eyesight (I still think the dot's pretty obvious, Michael) was able to begin a Toonbots tradition. My mark on history has been made.
|
Michael Tue Nov 14 15:48:27 2000
Re: 11/13 spoiler (return of an old friend)
> Indeed! I'm just happy to know that my eyesight (I still think the dot's
> pretty obvious, Michael) was able to begin a Toonbots tradition. My mark
> on history has been made.
Maybe it's obvious on your monitor, but on mine it's roughly the size of any one of a number of dust specks, except that it moves with the page and the dust specks don't.
I'm pretty sure at this point that I'm going to keep the Dot.
|
gopher Tue Nov 14 17:24:07 2000
Re: 11/13 spoiler (return of an old friend)
> Maybe it's obvious on your monitor, but on mine it's roughly the size of
> any one of a number of dust specks, except that it moves with the page and
> the dust specks don't.
Could just be the monitor, I suppose. Mine claims to be at 75dpi right now, so, yeah, I can see how you could miss it on a larger monitor or at a higher resolution than mine (1152x864 on a 17 in.). Or, it could just be that I have fingerprints instead of dust specs. Whatever.
|
|
