Tirdun Wed May 2 11:52:48 2001
Who Won?
So... who won the "cool enough" award for th 29th?
If nobody: then the new feature for the toon-o-matic is FONTS, specifically:
[caption font="ocraext" location="bottom middle" size="26"]
font="ocraext" is a specific font declaration. The location already existed, as did the size... I think. Yes, yes it did, becuase you used it in another epsiode prior.
If'n I'm too late, I won't be surprised. But as I saw no other posts, I figured what the hell.
|
Michael Wed May 2 11:58:54 2001
Re: Who Won?
> So... who won the "cool enough" award for the 29th?
Nobody, including you.
> If nobody: then the new feature for the toon-o-matic is FONTS,
> specifically:
That was the new feature for the 28th, but what really cool rendering feature first appeared on the 29th?
> If'n I'm too late, I won't be surprised. But as I saw no other posts, I
> figured what the hell.
Chris already tried with the font issue. Come on, come on.
|
Tirdun Wed May 2 13:15:57 2001
Re: Who Won?
> Chris already tried with the font issue. Come on, come on.
Uh, caption size.
I believe... I can't find that in any other XML.
|
Michael Wed May 2 18:01:30 2001
Re: Who Won?
> Uh, caption size.
> I believe... I can't find that in any other XML.
Nope, that's old. A casual glance through the archives shows a size of 68 on March 30, but font size was one of the things I first implemented with captions.
So... steeerike two!
|
gopher Wed May 2 19:54:51 2001
Re: Who Won?
> Nope, that's old. A casual glance through the archives shows a size of 68
> on March 30, but font size was one of the things I first implemented with
> captions.
> So... steeerike two!
Is it the combination of the aspect and facing propery? (aspect="2 faceleft") I don't remember seeing them together like that before.
|
Michael Wed May 2 23:30:47 2001
Re: Who Won?
> Is it the combination of the aspect and facing propery? (aspect="2
> faceleft") I don't remember seeing them together like that before.
No. Um... I'm not sure I actually ever used it before, but it's been in the code for quite a while.
Dang. I really thought this was obvious. It is to me. And in the end, you're all going to say, "Oh, *that*? Sheesh. You geek."
|
Chris Thu May 3 01:07:23 2001
Re: Who Won?
> Dang. I really thought this was obvious. It is to me. And in the end,
> you're all going to say, "Oh, *that*? Sheesh. You geek."
Now that I look at the comic again, it does seem embarrassingly obvious, which is probably why none of us got it.
CAPTION WORD WRAPPING.
...right?
|
Tirdun Thu May 3 05:39:37 2001
Re: Who Won?
> Now that I look at the comic again, it does seem embarrassingly obvious,
> which is probably why none of us got it.
> CAPTION WORD WRAPPING.
ACK Crap. I didn't even see that. I was looking at the darn CODE and not the actual strip for new stuff. Not that I didn't already look at the strip and all... heh.
-=I=- should've freakin got that since you'd all but advertised the fact that you were going to do it when you fixed up my fan XML. *BONK*
|
Michael Thu May 3 13:46:07 2001
Re: Who Won?
> Now that I look at the comic again, it does seem embarrassingly obvious,
> which is probably why none of us got it.
> CAPTION WORD WRAPPING.
> ...right?
DINGDINGDINGDING! Yes, we have a winner.
|
|
